Latest Commentary: -
Latest Blog: -
  • Michael Rosen Michael Rosen
  • Investment Insights are written by Angeles' CIO Michael Rosen

    Michael has more than 30 years experience as an institutional portfolio manager, investment strategist, trader and academic.


Published: 11-03-2014

With apologies to Walt Disney, the global economy is getting, well, more global, and, intuitively, companies’ sensitivities to  global macro factors increase in proportion to their global revenues.

When we look at conventional, market-cap weighted indices, we (implicitly) assume that 100% of the each company’s stock price is driven by domestic factors. We know, obviously, that this makes no sense logically for companies that operate globally. For example, when we own Samsung implicitly ascribe 100% of that holding to our Korea exposure. But the company gets less than 10% of its revenue from Korea, and it’s fortunes are dependent on non-Korean factors more than domestic ones. This statement holds true for many multinational corporations.

The chart shows the capitalization weights of the MSCI ACWI versus the revenue exposures of the same ACWI companies. It’s interesting that the differences are almost entirely between the US and EM: Europe, UK, Japan show little change. But the US weight falls in half and the EM weight triples when view by revenue rather than by capitalization.

No benchmark is perfect, but I suspect that over time we will gravitate to evaluating holdings on factors other than solely market capitalization.


友情链: im电竞APP(电竞体育手机版入口)|im电竞app官网 | im电竞在线登录(电竞游戏竞猜软件手机版)|im电竞下载地址 | im电竞APP网址(电竞直播竞猜平台下载)|im电竞app官网入口 | im电竞app官方网站(正规的电竞竞猜app)|im电竞app最新版 | im电竞app注册(电竞体育彩票竞猜网站下载)|im电竞平台app下载 | im电竞app下载(体育电竞盘app)|亚博IM电竞App | im电竞平台app(最新电竞竞猜app)|im电竞客户端官网app |